Showing posts with label Learn about gov't bodies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Learn about gov't bodies. Show all posts

Monday, March 05, 2012

Spotlight on the OECD

It is Monday and while the waiting for that third cup of coffee (or tea) to kick in, why not read a little about the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)? While there are probably a few of you non-governmental folks out there who can't imagine stuffing another acronym into your memory back, I would encourage you to find some room for this group.

First, who is the OECD and what do they do? This group started with 20 countries (18 European and the US and Canada), which were dedicated to development. It now is made up of 34 countries, most of the world's most developed countries and a few emerging countries. To be a member of OECD, countries must meet OECD standards on a wide range of policy areas (from economics to human rights).

Now that your brain is running away from all this history and policy, watch this video:



Ah, Paris. I would love to take a free trip to Paris. Want to try? Check out the OECD's contest page.

Alright, enough daydreaming of climbing the Eiffel Tower or strolling through the Louvre, let's take a look at some of the information you can find from the OECD. For example, there has been a lot of talk from the Occupy movement about the 99%, but is this real? And how widespread it this? Check out this video:



One of the amazing things that the OECD does is data gathering (by now you should know I will always get to numbers at some point) and since their membership contains many of the top economies in the world, this is a great group to go to when studying the developed world. Now the video links you to a web page with some of the information on this topic, but wouldn't you like to see all the data and the book itself? If you are here on campus (or off campus with the VPN), you can. We have a great database called the OECD iLibrary and in it you can access the full-text of Divided  We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising and so much more.

The data used in this book and that you can use to write your own study on this topic can be found in the OECD iLibrary's Social Expenditures Statistics data set, which has a section on Income Inequality, which has data on most of the members from the 70s till now.

But, that is not all you will find in the OECD iLibrary, just this year CU-Boulder has added access to IEA energy statistics (that is the International Energy Agency for those interested). These statistics have information such as use, production and prices of oil, natural gas, renewables, and other energy products. To see what data from this can look like, see this table:
IEA Energy Prices and Taxes in OECD iLibrary
Still want more? Check out the library's guide to the OECD.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

New Federal Sentencing Guidelines Take Effect November 1

Today, November 1, the new federal sentencing guidelines take effect.  One of the most significant changes involves bringing the penalty for possession of crack cocaine in line with the penalties for possession of cocaine in other forms.   In general terms this means lowering the mandatory sentence for possession of crack cocaine.   Although this portion of the new guidelines will take effect retroactively it is not an automatic "get out of jail" card.   Each case must be considered individually by a federal court.  National Public Radio did an interesting story on the changes to crack sentencing that could lead to early releases.  The story notes that the "disparity in sentences for crack versus powder had long been criticized as racially discriminatory because it disproportionately affected black defendants. The Fair Sentencing Act passed by Congress in 2010 and signed by President Barack Obama reduced the disparity for future cases."

For official information, go to the United States Sentencing Commission's website which has an  FAQ with information about the changes for crack cocaine. For more indepth information, consult the commission's report to Congress about the effects of mandatory sentences on the federal prison system.   The commission is charged with making "recommendations to Congress concerning modification or enactment of statutes relating to sentencing, penal, and correctional matters that the Commission finds to be necessary and advisable to carry out an effective, humane, and rational sentencing policy."  Aligning the sentences for crack cocaine with those for other forms of cocaine seems like a good step towards a more rational sentencing policy. 

For additional information on federal drug policy, the The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) website is a good place to start.  In addition to information about drug enforcement, the site includes pictures of drugs, fact sheets on legal and illegal drugs, and other useful information.

Pictures of cocaine from the DEA website.




You can also find more information about drugs and crime using the links on the Government Information's Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use page and on the Crime and Justice page.

Monday, October 03, 2011

The State of the Statistical Abstract

No one questions that Americans' tastes and interests are changing rapidly.  In 2009 American newspaper publishers received $13 billion less in total revenue from what they earned in 2005, a 26% decline (Tbl. 1134).   In 2011, 78% of American adults had access to the Internet, compared to only 53% in the year 2000 (Tbl. 1158 from 2012), and 59% of these users browsed the Internet to gather their news (Tbl. 1158 from 2011).  In another interesting shift, the year 2008 was the first year in American history when consumers spent more time playing video games -- 107 hours per person per year -- than they did reading books -- 104 hours per person per year. That transition became even more pronounced in 2009, when it was 121 hours spent with video games and only 98 with books (Tbl 1130).

Harry Potter, meet Marcus Fenix.
Americans spend more time now with video games than with books.
These figures help make it clear that the country is looking more to the computer screen for news and entertainment, and less toward what are considered "traditional" media: books, printed items, and radio, to name a few.  This suggests too, especially in a time of massive deficits and a record-setting financial crisis, that the burden is on the content creator when justifying publishing costs for media that may have less of an impact (or audience) than in years past.

On the budgetary chopping block this year is the very publication that provided all the numbers cited above, and whose latest edition for 2012 has just been released online (print copies are forthcoming): The Statistical Abstract of the United States. Published every year since 1878 (back when Rutherford Hayes was president), the Statistical Abstract is a compendium of statistics "on the social, political, and economic organization of the United States... designed to serve as a convenient volume for statistical reference and a as a guide to other statistical publications and sources" (Preface).
Will this be the last year ever for the Statistical Abstract?
What threatens the Statistical Abstract is a budget proposed by the U.S. Census Bureau this year which asks, due to a hostile climate for government expenditures and a justifiable fear of a more prolonged economic recession, for the elimination of the publication, as well as for the elimination of Current Industrial Reports, Federal Financial Statistics, and all but effectively ending the Economic Census of the United States.

Clip from the proposed budget for the U.S. Census Bureau, 2012.
Census Director Robert Groves explained the cuts in a blog post.
"The President presented a Census Bureau budget to Congress that was a real 11% cut from our funding the previous year. The Appropriations Committee in the House of Representatives has taken the first official action on that proposal, and cut that proposed budget further by 16.5 percent; our periodic programs request was cut 21 percent. The next steps for our funding bill are to be considered and then passed by the full House, then sent to the Senate. 
A cut of this magnitude in our periodic programs account means we cannot do all the work the Congress has asked us to do."
Since that post, Groves has gone on to write how similar data might be produced in the future, blogging here and here on the issue.

The public response to the notion to killing off the Statistical Abstract has been intense.  The most cited response has come from Robert Samuelson at The Washington Post, whose editorial has been linked or reprinted in full by newspapers across the country, from The New York Times to The Deseret News of Utah, to Ohio's Akron Beacon Journal, but articles and opinion pieces can be found in publications centered in the sciences, economics, government librarianship, and in business trades.

"The Stat Abstract has two great virtues," wrote Samuelson.
"First, it conveniently presents in one place a huge amount of information from a vast array of government and private sources. For example, the National Fire Protection Association tells us that 30,170 fire departments fought 1.45 million fires in 2008. Second, the footnotes show where to get more information."

From the position of Government Information Librarians, the Abstract is probably the single best publication released by the government to encapsulate the need for, and usefulness of the kinds of data the the United States collects.  For example, according to the 1878 Abstract, the national debt in 1860 was $7,065,990.56.  Total.  The 1995 Abstract tells us that the debt that year was estimated at $4,961,529,000,000.  What will our debt be in 2088?  On what will that money be spent?  These questions will be remarkably more difficult to answer without the data found in the the Statistical Abstract.

Or think of it this way:  If Americans are now spending their time reading online and playing video games, what will they be doing in 2020?  Or 2048?  How will they get their information?  Where will they work, and what will their jobs be?  What will they be doing for fun?

Without the Statistical Abstract, without the Census Bureau pursuing and compiling that information, there is no clear answer as to who Americans will turn to for not only gathering that information, but for releasing the information to the public, freely, without any restriction to access.  A person might be tempted to suggest that a wealthy and powerful company like Google take on the responsibility, but Google's practices for releasing data are murkier than their practices for collecting it.  And which do we believe will outlive the other:  An entity like Google, Inc., the railroad company of its era, or the government of the United States?  And which can be more easily held responsible for the publication and dissemination of data about the interests, habits, changes, and efforts of the American people?

While pondering these questions, you may wish to take a look through the Statistical Abstract to get a sense of its scope, and to contemplate what the loss of this data might do to your next research paper, or your next market anaysis, or your next home buying experience, and so on.  It is a singular and unique statistical publication in the history of nations. 

And next year it's gone.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Looking at American Pathology During Times of War

At times seemingly innocuous publications from the Federal Depository Program reveal interesting and underlooked segments in America history, and can lead to the discovery of even more interesting materials within the larger collection. One such case comes from the U.S. Army Medical Center, which released this month the book, "Legacy of Excellence," a review of the 150-year history of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.


Legacy of Excellence -- in print only. SuDoc #:D 101.2:AR 5/104

The Institute of Pathology began in 1862 as the Army Medical Museum, established by Brigadeer General WIlliam Hammond to "collect and properly catalog all specimens of morbid anatomy, both medical and surgical." Originally located in Hammond's Washington D.C. office, the museum relocated several times -- including, in 1866, one year after the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, to Ford's Theater -- while struggling with funding and recognition from both the Army and Congress.

By 1876, the collection held 6,539 specimens illustrating wounds and diseases produced during military service to the United States. Specimens include the usual archival items such as documents and photographs, but involve the unexpected as well: body casts to show specific wounds from different types of bullets, the bullets themselves, preserved limbs and bones from amputations, the skeletal remains of animals, and "wet" specimens of organs and tissues saved from military surgeries.


Images in the book highlight "wet" and "dry" specimens.


The material collected during the Civil War was used to create the multi-volume set, The Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion. This is a massive, 6,000 page set that provides a statistical compilation of the types of injuries a doctor might have expected to see during the Civil War, and their treatment.


Illustration from The Medical and Surgical History showing "excisions of the elbow joint for shot injury."

It's here where an extensive Federal Depository collection can reveal a depth of information to those interested in a particular topic. Living on the shelves near The Medical and Surgical History are a number of other related materials from the War Department (now known as the Department of Defense):

Defects Found in Drafted Men is a First World War-era set compiled from 1917-18 draft records that details by defect, disease, U.S. state, and urban and rural location, just under 2 million American males, aged 18-30.

A Report of Surgical Cases Treated in the Army of the United States from 1865 to 1871 is just that: a case-by-case description of surgeries performed on soldiers for the five-year period following the American Civil War. These surgeries are organized by area of the body and include descriptions of military suicides.


Mention of a Sword Wound to the Eye, from A Report of Surgical Cases (1871).

The Manual of Neuro-Surgery (1919) advised War-time surgeons on brain anatomy and physiology, the central nervous system, as well as details on head injuries and their repair.


Illustration from surgery to alleviate a suboccipital herniation.

Taken as a whole, these materials reveal the ongoing history of medical pathology in the U.S., and detail -- as is often the case in American history -- how the U.S. military turns its need to support and track the effective performance of American soldiers into benefits that expand outward to American civilian life.

Needless to say, U.S. Government Documents about pathology in general extended well outside the military realm. From the Department of Justice, for example, patrons see guidebooks like Forensic Pathology: A Handbook for Pathologists and the Crime Scene Search and Physical Evidence Handbook. There are books on autopsies, dealing with "mass fatality events," and annuals on the health and effectiveness of troops over time.

The soldier's experience informs innumerable aspects of American life.
For future medical students, patrons interested in military history, or those curious about the richly documented history of the American Civil War, titles like Legacy of Excellence and those above provide a fascinating and intensely vivid look into the medical profession as it benefits -- and has benefited from -- the American military experience.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Better Life Index

In yet another of my data is fun series, I bring you the OECD's Better Life Index. What makes your life good? Is it a strong educational system? Good health care? Strong Income? Or maybe a nice work-life balance? The OECD has taken the statistics for the 34 member countries and lets you determine which country matches your rankings, you can use all of the indicators I just mentioned plus a few more. It is a ton of fun.

For all of you who would rather watch a video, how about these two?

This first video is on the index linked above, but if you have no idea who the OECD is and want a longer look at why they are doing this, this second video is great.


I learned that the OECD was formed out of the Marshal Plan from that video. What did you learn? What do you value most in your better life index?

Want to know more about what the OECD has to offer? Why not check out the library's guide.

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

What is FDsys?

In addition to our usual tutorial videos, the Government Documents Library at CU Boulder is trying a few new approaches to engage and attract users to the types of information to be found in government resources. The video below, "What is FDsys?" is the first part in a short series on the GPO's Federal Digital System or FDsys. We hope you find it informative and useful, and welcome comments below.



And now you can find more videos about government sources at the CU Boulder Libraries YouTube channel.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

GPO Announces Google Partnership to Sell You Items It Provides Elsewhere For Free

The Government Printing Office announced on December 14 of this year a new partnership it has entered into with Google Books to sell -- "for the first time" -- "e-book format" versions of some of its more popular titles. According to the Press Release, the titles will appear in the Google ebookstore, "which can be searched, purchased and read on any connected device with a capable browser."

Keeping America Informed. O RLY?


Publications mentioned specifically in the Press Release include the following, with their current price at the Google ebookstore noted and linked in parenthesis:

The Budget of the United States, Fiscal Year 2011 ($9.99)
Remembering the Space Age ($7.99)
Borden's Dream: The Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC ($7.99)

And this is the strange part: If you clicked on the links for these titles above you will quickly realise that there are freely and legally accessible electronic copies of these materials already available -- all of which are also able to be "read on any connected device with a capable browser." Which means that the GPO partnership with Google sells information that can be found freely online from GPO and other government sources, and in nearly identical formats.

The Google ebookstore does not specify the file formats offered for these for-sale books, though the Press Release's qualifier implies strongly that these are PDF files locked into the Google ebookstore interface, or as Google likes to call it, "the digital cloud." Which means that if you download the freely available copies of these publications, you will actually have greater options for access (i.e., offline access, unattached to any specific account, and infinitely transferable) than you will if you purchase them. In other words, this partnership makes no sense at all.

Of course, fans of the Federal Depository Library Program (in which CU Boulder is one of more than 1,000 participants) will already know that the government has a proud (and legally mandated) history of disseminating government information freely to the general public. The FDLP is one of the reasons why this blog exists. So it is a mystery as to why the GPO would actively undermine the FDLP, and seemingly prey upon any general lack of awareness, with no disclaimer provided, that these materials being sold are also very easily found for free in the same or an exceptionally similar digital format.

In short, the partnership between GPO and Google is puzzling to understand from any number of sides. But at least it came in time for Christmas.

Monday, December 06, 2010

Internet Privacy and the 'Do Not Track' Proposal: The FTC is Open to Comments

Last Tuesday morning, the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection opened hearings on Internet privacy for consumers in a session entitled Do-Not-Track Legislation: Is Now the Right Time?

Dealing with how companies collect, compile and sell information about visitors to their commercial Web sites, the outcome of this discussion has the potential to create radical changes in consumer protection online, and a fundamental shift in the practices of almost every company that conducts business online.

The hearings may sound like something straight off the desk of Senator John McCain, but actually center around a plan by the Federal Trade Commission to allow consumers to opt out of having their personal information and Internet browsing habits be collected by commercial sites. Indeed, the plan goes one step further in protecting consumer rights by prohibiting any such tracking of Internet behaviors except where permission has been explicitly provided by consumers. In other words, individuals would have to opt in before their information could be tracked, stored, or sold, which is nearly an about face from current Internet business practices that rarely broadcast when profiles are created for visitors, or when -- and to whom -- those profiles are sold.

Similar in title to the widely popular Do-Not-Call Implementation Act of 2003, which gave the Federal Trade Commission powers to enforce the National Do-Not-Call Registry, the Do-Not-Track proposal also shares a significant framework with that Law. Both are structured around a year 2000 document from the FTC called Fair Information Practice (FIP) Principles.


Similarities between the proposed Do-Not-Track plan and the Do-Not-Call Registry are very intentional. No word on whether either apply within a women's correctional facility.


Foremost among the FIP principles are notice and awareness, with the following items "recognized as essential to ensuring that consumers are properly informed before divulging personal information":

Identification of the entity collecting the data;
Identification of the uses to which the data will be put;
Identification of any potential recipients of the data;
The nature of the data collected and the means by which it is collected if not obvious (passively, by means of electronic monitoring, or actively, by asking the consumer to provide the information);
Whether the provision of the requested data is voluntary or required, and the consequences of a refusal to provide the requested information; and
The steps taken by the data collector to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and quality of the data.


One key difference that the FTC recommends, however, is that while the Do-Not-Call Registry requires a unique identifier for each opt out (i.e., a specific telephone number to be added to the block list), Do-Not-Track legislation should NOT require a unique identifier -- because that would effectively identify individuals who have asked specifically NOT to be uniquely identified. Instead, the FTC proposed in their testimony that the most effective opt out would "likely involve placing a setting similar to a persistent cookie on a consumer’s browser, and conveying that setting to sites that the browser visits, to signal whether or not the consumer wants to be tracked or receive targeted advertisements."

Questions remain on how current browser privacy options do or do not comply with the FTC's stated goals, and whether a browser setting provides enough of desired protections. The plan is an interesting beginning, however, to a needed conversation on expectations of Internet privacy and the realities of online commerce.

The FTC's full report is available as a PDF: Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change. You can also watch a streaming video of the hearing or download that video by following the links at the bottom of this FTC page.

Click the image to see a PDF copy of the FTC's proposed Internet Privacy plan.



The FTC is also accepting Public Commentary on its plan for Internet Privacy. Public comments will be accepted until January 31, 2011. To file a public comment electronically, please click here and follow the instructions.

Monday, November 15, 2010

New Documents of Note for Nov. 15: Microfinance, New Orleans, and HIV Prevention

Here are interesting and timely selections recently received at the CU Boulder Libraries. This week's items are all Congressional Hearings, which provide an excellent level of detail on their subjects, as well as input and testimony from recognized experts in their areas. Hearings are available in print, as well as electronically from a variety of sources such as FDsys (linked here) or via LexisNexis Congressional.

Promoting Small and Micro Enterprise in Haiti
A fascinating topic of sustained interest for Economists, especially as the subject garnered a Nobel Peace Prize for India’s Muhammad Yunus in 2006.

Post-Katrina Recovery: Restoring Health Care in the New Orleans Region
Here combined are two topics that may very well define the legacies of our most recent Presidents – access to health care, and the destruction and recovery of the city of New Orleans.

The Domestic Epidemic is Worse Than We Thought: A Wake-Up Call for HIV Prevention
A topic truly without boundaries, HIV prevention is the focus of worldwide attention, yet prevention practices encouraged by U.S.-funded programs remain highly politicized.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Propaganda, Pearl Harbor, and the Wartime History of the FBIS

Envisioning intelligence gathering in the mid-20th century can bring to mind noir-like images of trenchcoated operatives and men and women hunched over wireless radios and typewriters – in short, something out of the novels of Eric Ambler and Alan Furst. As stereotypical as that may seem, there’s some truth to the idea when looking at the United States’s effort to monitor foreign radio traffic with the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, or FBIS.

The FBIS got its start in February of 1941, when President Franklin Roosevelt created its WWII-era predecessor, the Foreign Broadcast Monitoring Service. As shown below – in an excerpt from the 1942 volume of the Government Manual – the role of the FBMS was to monitor foreign propaganda and to help predict policy shifts from foreign governments.


On July 29, 1941, five-months after President Roosevelt's order, and four months before a fateful change in America's own policy, FBMS Director Lloyd Free testified to the Senate Appropriations Committee on the necessity of monitoring broadcast communications, which then were primarily shortwave radio signals.


Director Free continued:


Free's push for increased funding and increased legitimacy for the FBMS was timely, as monitoring stations in Portland, Ore. (the first FBMS locale), San Juan, P.R., London and Kingsville, Tex. – some set up only months before – were helpful in capturing broadcasts and shortwave transmissions coming from parts of Asia unfriendly toward the U.S.

Indeed, in a manner that may strike a tone reminiscent of criticisms of intelligence gathering before the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, FBIS's first report, issued on December 6th, 1941, detailed Japan's increasingly aggressive tone toward the United States.* The next day, the Hawaiian port of Pearl Harbor was viciously attacked by Japanese air forces, and America entered as an active combatant into World War II.

From American Memory: The USS West Virginia on fire, bomed a day after the FBMS released its report on increasing hostility from Japan.



Joseph E. Roop, an FBIS editor from 1942-1966, wrote in his history of the FBIS (a book only recently declassified in 2009), "It must be said that when the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor suddenly plunged the United States into war, FBMS was in position, but only partially prepared."

Not surprisingly, Roop found that after Pearl Harbor, the demand for the Service would come to surpass that of mainstream news outlets.



As America's participation in World War II expanded, so did the demand for the FMBS. Broadcast transcripts from Russia and China were in high demand in 1941, according to Roop, and by 1944, in his testimony to the House Committee to Investigate the Federal Communications Commission FBIS Director Robert Leigh presented a list to the House of more than 50 languages and regional dialects to which the FBIS provided translations, much of this in response to Nazi propaganda efforts.



Ironically, it was amid Congressional threats to reduce its budget that Leigh presented his information. The article "FBIS Against the Axis, 1941-1945," featured in the CIA's Studies In Intelligence journal gives an excellent and brief overview of the FBIS's continuing struggles for legitimacy, recognition, and, of course, funding, amid political bickering and a full-scale investigation of the FCC.

The article also succinctly captures the end of this complicated chapter in the FBIS's history, when Congress showed its willinesss to close the FBIS at the end of the World War:
With the Axis in ashes, people were ready to forget the world once more. OSS was disbanded in September 1945, the month that Japan signed the instruments of surrender. On 15 August, FBIS had monitored Emperor Hirohito’s announcement that Japan would surrender. Four months later, on 4 December, the last Daily Report appeared. The FCC terminated FBIS the following day. Thus ended the wartime service of Washington’s premier OSINT organization.

In January 1946, the War Department’s Military Intelligence Division took the baton from the FCC and assumed ownership of FBIS. The first issue of the new Daily Report was published that same month.

The FBIS continued under the Military Intelligence Division (and under the Central Intelligence Agency) until 1996, facing similiar challenges to its legitimacy along the way, but even today a version of the Service still exists. The result is a body of work from the FBIS that has become, in effect, one of the richest mines of primary source materials available in translation to scholars of history, poitics, foreign policy, foreign journalism and propaganda.

The results of this history are present in the FBIS Daily Reports. This database, whose coverage at UCB spans 1974-1996, demonstrates the wealth of original language news reports, interviews, and broadcasts captured, translated, and transcribed by the Service.

To encourage exploration and provide easy organization, the database has an "Events" tab that allows for a thorough look from non-U.S. media on dozens of historic events, including the 1990 Persian Gulf War, the 1994 election of South African President Nelson Mandela, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1998, the Indonesian invasion of Timor in 1975, and the Iranian capture of the U.S. Embassy in 1979 that led to U.S. hostages held captive for 444 days.

Students of journalism in particular may find that the presentation of history takes on a significantly different tone through the media of other nations, especially those with hostile relationships to the United States. The Soviet Union’s 1986 announcement of the massive Chernobyl nuclear meltdown is announced in this article by Moscow TASS in one line, followed by six paragraphs on "similar accidents" in the U.S.


What becomes clear, whichever region or event you explore, is that the FBIS Daily Reports provide a truly unique means to discover primary sources, in translation, about some of the world's most significant events. Add to that, the FBIS's own history is as complicated and fascinating as that of any government effort, with startling ties to the events and era that led to its creation. These are resources, both in front of and behind the scenes, that those interested in American history, espionage, propaganda and legitimate journalism, should not miss.

Thursday, March 04, 2010

Senate Reconciliation on Health Care

President Obama is insisting that Congress swiftly pass a health care reform bill, as he urged them to do on Wednesday (find the video clip and transcript on whitehouse.gov). The New York Times reports that Obama is asking Congress to have a simple "up or down" vote on the bill known as "reconciliation," although the President doesn't use this specific term.

So what is congressional reconciliation, exactly? This term is explained in the House of Representatives document How Our Laws Are Made (enter "reconciliation" in the search box of the PDF): "In the Senate, reconciliation bills reported from committee are entitled to expedited consideration, permitting a majority of Senators, rather than sixty, to ensure consideration of the bill with limited time for amendments." The reconciliation process is described with even further detail in the Congressional Research Service report, The Budget Reconciliation Process: House and Senate Procedures.

"But wait," you might ask, "This isn't about a budget." Therein lies some controversy. See this National Public Radio report, posted on Senator Bernie Sanders' (I-VT) web site, which states that U.S. health legislation has a history of being included in budgets and thus being allowed to follow the expedited reconciliation process.

Want to learn more about the legislative process? Take a look at our guide to Congress and Legislation.

Friday, June 05, 2009

OAS to Lift Ban on Cuba

After intense discussion that pitted nations against one another, the Organization of American States (OAS) agreed to allow Cuba to become a member of the OAS provided that Cuba meet requirements on democracy and human rights. Cuba has been banned from the OAS for 47 years. As described in the Washington Post, the Cuba issue had Nicaragua and Venezuela threatening to quit OAS and forced the U.S. to make compromises.

The OAS consists of 35 nations of the Western Hemisphere (North, South, and Central America and the Caribbean) that aim to strengthen democracy, promote human rights, and find solutions to problems such as poverty, terrorism, illegal drugs, and corruption. Member states are listed here; as you can see, Cuba is currently listed as "excluded" from the organization.

The OAS has not yet posted an updated statement about Cuba to its website. You can read a U.S. perspective on the decision in this press release from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The OAS website provides a number of resources on topics affecting the Americas (see the "OAS Sectors and Topics" box at the top of each OAS web page). For additional resources, check out our portal to international organizations.

Monday, May 04, 2009

United Nations Web Site Updated

Happy Monday, for today's afternoon break why not check out the new United Nations web site? The new interface is designed to provide easier access to all the UN information you are used to finding on the old site. Here are some of the features:
  • In a bar across the top is a list of some of the top issues the UN works with: Peace and Security, Development, Human Rights, Humanitarian Affairs, and International Law. I like this setup because you no longer need to know who deals with these issues, you can instead click on these topics and get links directly to those organizations and news pages. My one complaint would be that Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs are two very related topics and for people looking for information on those areas they will have to go to both pages.
  • The In Focus feature on the right lets you link directly to UN news on a particular issue that is in the news. For example, right now you can see news on Influenza A(H1N1), Situation in the Middle East, and Climate Change. Note this is not news from all sources, just UN information.
  • There is an RSS feed to recent news from the UN news center, which covers all the UN organizations.
  • Finally, there is an update to the Global Issues on the UN Agenda, now simply called Global Issues. I have encouraged people for years to use this resource to find out the UN organizations that are working on a particular topic. The redesign of this resource now includes an overview of the topic, such as Disarmament, as well as links to the UN agencies working on that issue.
I hope you have fun playing around in this new design, please leave comments on features you like or dislike on this entry. If you want more UN resources, check out the library's guide.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

It has been a while since we talked in-depth about a government agency and so today I thought I would talk about the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). NTIS is a bit different then many government agencies in that it is allowed to charge for its services, in fact it the American Technology Preeminance Act of 1992 "required all costs associated with bibliographic control to be recovered by fees." To learn more about the development of this agency, check out the About NTIS page.

So what to do they provide access to? NTIS collects all scientific and technical information produced by the government or sponsored by the government. They have provide copies of this material on a cost-recovery basis to the rest of us. Now if you are here in Boulder you are lucky because CU-Boulder has one of the largest collections of technical reports outside of the government.

So how do you find it? There are a variety of tools to choose from:
  • NTIS Index This is a subscription resource from Engineering Village available on CU-Boulder's campus that lets you search the index of the NTIS collection. For help using this database, check out the library's guide.
  • NTIS This is the free search of the NTIS collection (again only an index with no full-text access), you don't get quite the same nice search features, but it is open to everyone with no limitations.
  • National Technical Reports Library (NTRL) This is another subscription resource that CU-Boulder is trialing right now. The first two resources only give you citations, this database provides full-text access to the reports within the database. If you like this database (or hate it), please fill out the library's trial evaluation form.
  • RSS feeds If you don't want to keep searching the databases, but you want to know when new resources come out subscribe to one of these feeds.
A few tips on technical reports:
  • Many of these reports are available online, if you want to check out if they are in another source search the title in a google or another search engine.
  • If you are having trouble finding a copy, visit the library or email us.
Still want more technical reports? There are lots of databases from agencies other then NTIS, check out the library's guide.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

GAO Releases This Week

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is often called the investigative arm of Congress. This week they investigated a variety of issues, such as bankruptcy, the Endangered Species Act, and modernizing the financial regulatory system. If you would like to know more about the GAO, check out the library's guide.

Reports
Correspondence
Testimonies
  • Financial Regulation: A Framework for Crafting and Assessing Proposals to Modernize the Outdated U.S. Financial Regulatory System, by Gene L. Dodaro, acting comptroller general, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. GAO-09-314T, January 21.
    http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-09-314T
  • Real Property: Infrastructure Investment Presents Opportunities to Address Long-standing Real Property Backlogs and Reduce Energy Consumption, by Terrell G. Dorn, director, physical infrastructure, before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. GAO-09-324T, January 22.
    http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-09-324T

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

G-8 tackles greenhouse gas emissions

The G-8 is meeting this week and has released preliminary information on a goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Before we look into this I thought it might be nice to explain a little about the G-8.

The G-8 is a group of eight countries, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The leaders of these eight countries meet once a year to discuss issues on a global scale (as well as having their representatives meet more often on specific issues). Want to learn more about the summit and the G-8, but in a much simpler form? Check out the kid's page, developed by Japan who is hosting this year's summit.

The big agreement to come out of the summit thus far is in regards to countries cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The last major international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol, was never ratified by the United States, and focused on getting industrialized countries to cut emissions by 2012 (see web site for more details). The G-8 statement can be found online, but you will notice that while the discussions mentioned a 50% cut this statement does not set specific goals. For more details, such as press conferences and statements, check out the summit web site.

Want to read more about this statement and reactions from developing countries, such as China and India? Check out the Washington Post's "G-8 Conference Tackles Global Warming Treaty: China, India Still Balk at Efforts to Curb Greenhouse Gases."

Want more on climate change? Check out the library's guide.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

For all of you who are big statistics fans out there, one of the nice sources for economic data is the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). I haven't done an explanation of a what an international organization does in an embarrassingly long time, so today I am going to make up for that.

The OECD is made up of thirty countries, representing the largest economies in the world. Their purpose is to "support sustainable economic growth, boost employment, raise living standards, maintain financial stability, assist other countries' economic development, and contribute to growth in world trade" (from the about page).

So what? Well, what this means is they gather data and statistics on all of these things and report that information out to the rest of the world. They right in-depth reports and provide access to a variety of databases. Now if you are here on Boulder's campus we have access to their nice subscription database SourceOECD, but if you are not a student don't despair. The library has a guide linking to a variety of free sources of information from this group.

While the main focus of the OECD work is on the developed world, they do developing countries research and for a sample of that, check out the African Economic Outlook for 2008 for free online.

Monday, October 01, 2007

Supreme Court Begins Term Today

The new term of the U.S. Supreme Court begins today. The Court's term begins on the first Monday in October. Some of the cases before the Court this term include:
  • Guantanamo Detainees: Court will determine whether detainees can use U.S. civil courts to challenge indefinite incarceration (Boumediene v. Bush, 06-1195, Al-Odah v. U.S., 06-1196).
  • Lethal Injections: Court will determine whether lethal injection violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Baze v. Rees, 07-5439).
  • Voter Photo ID: Court will determine whether laws requiring voters to show photo identification to vote violates the Constitution. (Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 07-21, Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita, 07-25).
  • Presidential Power: Court will hear a separation of powers case where they will determine whether the president has the power to set aside a state law to abide by international treaty in the case of a convicted Mexican national (Medellin v. Texas, 06-984).
Check out all the cases the Supreme Court will hear this season.

Read "Supreme Court to Take On Contentious Cases in New Term" from the Washington Post and "Lethal Injection, Child Porn, Guantanamo Bay on New Docket for Supreme Court" from FOX News.

Want more information on the Supreme Court? Check out the library's guide.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

CIA, still going strong with no strong of retiring at 60

In a tiny little story today on NPR (see or listen to the paragraph here) I learned the CIA has turned 60. For more on this birthday, check out the press release from the CIA. So in honor of this big birthday, I thought I would highlight some of the resources from and about the CIA.


First, let's take a look at their online library. From here you can link to resources, such as the World Factbook, CIA Maps, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Reading Room. The World Factbook provides you with information on foreign countries, their governments and the people that live there. The FOIA room provides links to selected declassified resources from the CIA.

Speaking of declassified materials, if you are on campus why not check out one of the two databases with information on declassified materials: Declassified Documents Reference Service and the Digital National Security Library. For those of you not on campus check out the Freedom of Information Act and Declassified Documents guides.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

World Health Organization

The World Health Organization (WHO) is the group concerned with health within the United Nations System. They deal with health issues from AIDS to Avian Influenza.

There are two major areas of their web site that might be of interest to those of you looking at world health issues. The first section is the Countries page. On this page all the members of the United Nations are listed and on each page is some basic statistics, including life expectancy. There are also links to any programs or outbreaks dealing with health.

The second section of interest is the Health Topics page. This page links to in-depth looks at health issues on a global scale. There is information in here on the topics you might expect such as AIDS and tuberculosis, but there is also links to information on topics you may not expect to find, such as Alcohol and Drinking water.

Finally, the World Health Organization produces a number of publications, many of which are freely available online. Today they released World Health Statistics 2007. This third edition includes a section with 10 highlights of global health statistics for the past year as well as an expanded set of 50 health statistics for all 193 UN member countries.

Want some more health information? Check out the library's guide.